| WrlckThWckd Application | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
WrlckThWckd
Posts : 84 FU Points : 100 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-07-30 Age : 61 Location : Near Petticoat Junction
| Subject: WrlckThWckd Application Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:16 pm | |
| Hi,
I am looking for a good alliance. I am a quality player, I am currently playing on another server and I am in the top 10,000 in population. I am an offensive player and I have destroyed several hammers, guess I sent them to the wrong place. My hero has only died 12 times. I have fully upgraded my hammer units in the armory. I trained my hammer in my capital a 6c, but I store it in my 15c.
I already have a head start on my hammer for this server, I have five mace men. Hopefully I will achieve a one to one troop to pop ratio by endgame.
All in all, I feel I would be an asset to any alliance. Please consider me for membership.
Sincerely,
Wrlck | |
|
| |
pangea 1. Schütze
Posts : 226 FU Points : 274 Reputation : 11 Join date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: WrlckThWckd Application Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:18 pm | |
| I think we found our leader!! | |
|
| |
con-man 2. Gefreiter
Posts : 696 FU Points : 722 Reputation : -7 Join date : 2009-05-13 Age : 30 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: WrlckThWckd Application Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:30 pm | |
| We will never have a leader... but you know that
Wrlck you didnt need to fill out an app you are from Qod... 5 maceman lol funny joke | |
|
| |
dragonbreath1 3. Gefreiter UA
Posts : 239 FU Points : 284 Reputation : 7 Join date : 2009-07-27
| Subject: Re: WrlckThWckd Application Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:36 pm | |
| lol conman. the whole thing was a joke. maybe you should read it over again, lol | |
|
| |
con-man 2. Gefreiter
Posts : 696 FU Points : 722 Reputation : -7 Join date : 2009-05-13 Age : 30 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: WrlckThWckd Application Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:40 pm | |
| Oops I read it as 10k pop... I skimed the first P... I hardly ever read all of the long posts... keep that in mind when this happens next time. | |
|
| |
WrlckThWckd
Posts : 84 FU Points : 100 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-07-30 Age : 61 Location : Near Petticoat Junction
| Subject: Re: WrlckThWckd Application Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:51 pm | |
| Oops, I was going to tell you to look up the definition of filibuster, didn't know the first definition. I thought long BS posts were required. lol
Main Entry: filibuster !fi-lu-+bus-tur Pronunciation: \ ˈfi-lə-ˌbəs-tər \ Function: noun Etymology: Spanish filibustero, literally, freebooter Date: 1851 Results 1. 1 an irregular military adventurer specifically an American engaged in fomenting insurrections in Latin America in the mid-19th century 2. 2 2filibuster a. a the use of extreme dilatory tactics in an attempt to delay or prevent action especially in a legislative assembly b. b an instance of this practice | |
|
| |
con-man 2. Gefreiter
Posts : 696 FU Points : 722 Reputation : -7 Join date : 2009-05-13 Age : 30 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: WrlckThWckd Application Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:00 pm | |
| Manslaughter came up with it... told me the definition once its a great name for us | |
|
| |
con-man 2. Gefreiter
Posts : 696 FU Points : 722 Reputation : -7 Join date : 2009-05-13 Age : 30 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: WrlckThWckd Application Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:09 pm | |
| I think we are gunna get along. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: WrlckThWckd Application Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:11 pm | |
| LOL I'm going to tell everyone else to save their gold and time and just restart on a different server now |
|
| |
Manslaughter 3. Gefreiter UA
Posts : 818 FU Points : 1027 Reputation : 29 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 38
| Subject: Re: WrlckThWckd Application Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:29 pm | |
| v. fil·i·bus·tered, fil·i·bus·ter·ing, fil·i·bus·ters v.intr. 1. To use obstructionist tactics in a legislative body. 2. To take part in a private military action in a foreign country.
I think it fits in two ways.
1. we are using obstructionist tactics to bring down this server (not legislative or talking, thats true, but obstructionist none the same) 2. We are taking part in a "private" military action in a foreign server, specifically with the goal of the obstructionist tactics from definition #1.
also, it is a bit more legit to the MH then some of the idea's con-man was throwing around. I have never seen an entire alliance get banned but if someone could do it it would sure as hell be con-man.
PS. Ben (Wrlck), I love the avatar. nice to finally put a face with the name. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: WrlckThWckd Application | |
| |
|
| |
| WrlckThWckd Application | |
|